Enrique has a B.S. in Computer Science in 2010 at UCLV. He is a Software Engineer and DevOps Enthusiast at DATYS where he has been working as a software developer, team lead and automation nut. He’s part of the team that drives adoption of new technologies and he has been constantly involved in automation and exploring ways to do it properly and as risk free as possible. He has strong interest in DevOps and BigData challenges. He is part of the transition to a microservice oriented architecture on immutable infrastructure, containers and elastic partitioning. He is also a conference Speaker and co-organizer for DevOpsDays Cuba.
When he is not writing code or researching new technologies, he enjoys traveling and sharing his skills
with other like minded professionals who want to make the world more awesome. Outside of work,
Enrique loves spending time with family and building novel and exciting project.
Experience
As member of local organizers (Yadier Perdomo and Manuel Oliver) and together with Rudy Gevaert as main
organizer We organized the first DevOpsDays Cuba October, 18-21 2016.
@devopsdayscuba
official page
Languages
| |
|
| Spanish: |
Native or bilingual proficiency |
| English: |
Profesional working proficiency |
Skills
| |
|
| Software Engineer |
Software Configuration Management, Agile Development Methodologies, Project Management and Design patterns, BDD, TDD, Continuous {Integration/Delivery/Deployment}, Infrastructure as Code |
| Source code management |
Git, GitHub, GitLab, Git-Flow, Subversion. |
| Project Management |
TFS, YouTrack. |
| Build and Release |
Maven, SBT, Jenkins and GitlabCI. |
| Automation Tools |
Chef, Ansible. |
| Monitoring Tools |
cAdvisor, ELK(ElasticSearch, Logstash, Kibana), Graphana. |
| Virtualization and Containers |
Docker, Vagrant, XenServer, Citrix, Xen Orchestra, VMWare, MDADM. |
| Operating Systems |
Ubuntu, RedHat, CoreOS, Windows |
| Lenguages |
Java, Ruby, PHP, Markdown and UML. |
| Frameworks |
Spring framework, Ruby on Rails. |
| Data Base System |
MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB. |
| Others |
DevOps, Machine Learning, Kettle, Weka, Feature Selection, OOP, Apache Camel, Web Services, Sonar, Business Inteligence, Deis, PaaS, Marathon, Apache Mesos, Apache Spark, Nginx. |
Education
| |
|
| School |
Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas |
| Dates |
2013 - 2017 |
| Degree |
Master of Science (MS) |
| Field of Study |
Computer Science |
| Grade |
|
| Activities and Societies |
Programing and Software Engineer Lab |
| Description: |
|
| |
|
| School |
Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas |
| Dates |
2005 - 2010 |
| Degree |
Bachelor of Science (BS) |
| Field of Study |
Computer Science |
| Grade |
|
| Activities and Societies |
AI Group |
| Description: |
|
Projects
Courses
- Advanced Programming Techniques
- Introduction to Computational Mathematics
- Database for decision-making
- Distributed Databases
- Systems based on knowledge
- Artificial Neural Networks
- Concurrence and Recovery
- Advanced Software Engineering
- Communications and Computer Networks
- Advanced aspects of Software Engineering
- Advanced Data Structures
- Proyect Management
- Models of data and knowledge
- Investigation methodology
- Problem Solving Methods
- Artificial Intelligence
- Software Quality
Publications
| |
|
| Title |
COMPARACIÓN DE HERRAMIENTAS DE GESTIÓN DE LA CONFIGURACIÓN / COMPARISON OF CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT TOOLS |
| Publication/Publisher |
Conference: IV Taller Internacional Las TIC en la Gestión de las Organizaciones (Informática 2016) |
| Publication Date |
March, 16 2016 |
| Publication URL |
download |
| Author(s) |
Enrique Carbonell, Ana María García Pérez |
| Description: |
|
The configuration management tools (CMT) essentially allow automation of installation, configuration
and update of system’s software. The variety of these tools available in the market makes it difficult
the right selection according to the needs of clients when you do not have consultant experts. The purpose
of this work is select the features to build a comparative framework and apply it to four of the most
popular CMT. In order to select some CMT we take into account some benchmarks of previous studies and
join with others proposed here to obtain a simple comparative framework. The tools selected by popularity
went: CFEngine, Puppet, Ansible and Salt. This work provides a summary table where the selected features
are evaluated in each of analyzed tools.
Events
